Control map · 45 CFR Part 164
HIPAA
Code evidence for the technical safeguards and the Privacy Rule’s use and disclosure requirements, where they live in code.
Code evidence
7requirements checked on every pull requestLive (process)
0none mappedPlanned
1can be evidenced from code or GitHub; not built yetOrganisation-level requirements
Policies, people, vendors, physical security and the like, listed below.Toevan gives supporting evidence for 2 of these.Managed by your organisation’s workflowsThe Security Rule’s technical safeguards and parts of the Privacy Rule are visible in code: access control, integrity, authentication, transmission security and how protected health information is used and disclosed.
The HIPAA blueprint gives code evidence for these on every pull request. Administrative and physical safeguards stay with your programme.
Toevan gives evidence for controls; it never certifies them or claims a framework is covered. Whether the evidence is sufficient is your auditor’s judgement.
Code evidence7
Sealed on every pull request. Always partial: the control also asks for things outside code. Rules in the HIPAA blueprint check part of each on every pull request.
164.308(a)(4)Information access management164.308 Administrative safeguards164.312(a)(1)Access control164.312 Technical safeguards164.312(c)(1)Integrity164.312 Technical safeguards164.312(d)Person or entity authentication164.312 Technical safeguards164.312(e)(1)Transmission security164.312 Technical safeguards164.502Uses and disclosures of protected health information: General rulesPrivacy Rule164.514Other requirements relating to uses and disclosures of protected health informationPrivacy Rule
Supporting2
Toevan records related evidence, but the duty is organisational, so it never counts as covered.
164.310(d)(1)Device and media controls164.310 Physical safeguardsSupporting evidence: a rule records evidence related to this duty. The duty itself is physical security.164.504Uses and disclosures: Organizational requirementsPrivacy RuleSupporting evidence: a rule records evidence related to this duty. The duty itself is contracts and vendors.
Planned1
Can be evidenced from code or GitHub. No rule checks these yet; each is planned, and none counts as evidence today.
164.312(b)Audit controls164.312 Technical safeguards
Organisation-level requirements
Organisation-level controls (policies, people, vendors, physical security and the like) stay with your organisation’s own process; Toevan does not cover them.
Show the list
164.308 Administrative safeguards
164.310 Physical safeguards
164.314 Organizational requirements
164.316 Policies and procedures and documentation requirements
Breach Notification Rule
Privacy Rule
Using it in an audit
- Read the code evidence for the period
Each pull request carries sealed code results against the blueprint’s rules, pinned to the commit and the rule-set version in force.
- Test a sample
For each sampled record, check its results, then verify it offline against the published key with openssl and the shell: get the evidence, confirm the key, check the record. To replay the whole chain, Toevan provides the toevan command on request; it is not yet public.
- Recomputed
- Toevan computed it from the code or git history itself.
- Reported + sealed
- GitHub reported it; Toevan captured it at the event and signed it.
- Declared + sealed
- The organisation declared it, such as a change to what is checked; Toevan signed the declaration and its history.
- Toevan record, not sealed
- Held in Toevan’s database but not sealed in the ledger, such as a waiver today. Nothing protects it by a signature.
- Consumed
- Taken from GitHub’s deployment and release records and linked by commit or digest.
- Not captured
- No reliable source was available. Toevan does not infer it.
Test the mapping on a real audit.
Bring one repository and an upcoming audit. We’ll set up the blueprint and walk your auditor through verification.
- One repository, one framework
- Evidence from the first pull request
- Verifiable without a Toevan account